<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sean Hakes &#187; matt cutts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.seanhakes.com/tag/matt-cutts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.seanhakes.com</link>
	<description>Straight Talk From a Local Online Marketer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Caffeine Data Center 209.85.225.103</title>
		<link>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2010/02/06/google-caffeine-data-center-209-85-225-103/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2010/02/06/google-caffeine-data-center-209-85-225-103/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google / SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[209.85.225.103]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google caffeine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanhakes.com/?p=1739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This isn&#8217;t new news by any means but its helpful for those who are looking to test their search engine results with Google&#8217;s new roll-out; Google Caffeine. Matt Cutts from Google confirmed that the IP Address 209.85.225.103 is hitting the data center that is running the Caffeine index about 50% of the time. So there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t new news by any means but its helpful for those who are looking to test their search engine results with Google&#8217;s new roll-out; <a href="http://www.seanhakes.com/tag/google-caffeine/">Google Caffeine</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seanhakes.com/tag/matt-cutts/">Matt Cutts</a> from <a href="http://www.seanhakes.com/tag/google/">Google</a> confirmed that the IP Address <a href="http://www.seanhakes.com/tag/209-85-225-103/">209.85.225.103</a> is hitting the data center that is running the Caffeine index about 50% of the time.</p>
<p>So there you have it; Caffeine is live on a single data center. More Google news to come in the near future&#8230; <img src='http://blog.seanhakes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2010/02/06/google-caffeine-data-center-209-85-225-103/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Submit your SEO question to Google&#8217;s Matt Cutts</title>
		<link>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2009/12/05/submit-your-seo-question-to-googles-matt-cutts/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2009/12/05/submit-your-seo-question-to-googles-matt-cutts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 04:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google / SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanhakes.com/?p=967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Cutts who we in the web world know as our one and only liason to Google and SEO has announced he is now accepting question submissions about SEO his Google Moderator page. If you fancy a question and want to ask the Google Celeb, Matt  Cutts you can do it here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/answer-video-questions/" target="_blank">Matt Cutts</a> who we in the web world know as our one and only liason to Google and SEO has announced he is now accepting question submissions about SEO his Google Moderator page.</p>
<p>If you fancy a question and want to ask the Google Celeb, <a href="http://www.seanhakes.com/tag/matt-cutts/">Matt  Cutts</a> <a href="http://moderator.appspot.com/#16/e=113a2a" target="_blank">you can do it here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2009/12/05/submit-your-seo-question-to-googles-matt-cutts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much does bounce rate and average time on site affect rankings?</title>
		<link>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2009/11/17/how-much-does-bounce-rate-and-average-time-on-site-affect-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2009/11/17/how-much-does-bounce-rate-and-average-time-on-site-affect-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google / SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanhakes.com/blog/?p=781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s Matt Cutts stated that this is NOT part of the algorithm yet&#8230; hints  the word &#8216;yet&#8216; but we are seeing some some evidence of it now&#8230; I will release more about this later.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s <a href="http://www.seanhakes.com/blog/tag/matt-cutts/">Matt Cutts</a> stated that this is NOT part of the algorithm <em>yet&#8230; </em>hints  the word &#8216;<em><strong>yet</strong></em>&#8216; but we are seeing some some evidence of it now&#8230; I will release more about this later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2009/11/17/how-much-does-bounce-rate-and-average-time-on-site-affect-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why you shouldn&#8217;t take Google Webmasters Central seriously</title>
		<link>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2009/11/16/why-you-shouldnt-always-take-google-webmasters-central-serious/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2009/11/16/why-you-shouldnt-always-take-google-webmasters-central-serious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google / SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmasters central]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanhakes.com/blog/?p=735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is one of those posts that are really going to chap some backsides but its a particular topic of interest of mine that I have been meaning to talk about for a long time &#8211; tell me if I am wrong, but here are a few reasons why I don&#8217;t think YOU should really [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of those posts that are really going to chap some backsides but its a particular topic of interest of mine that I have been meaning to talk about for a long time &#8211; tell me if I am wrong, but here are a few reasons why I don&#8217;t think YOU should really take Google Webmaster Central &#8216;expert&#8217; advice seriously..</p>
<p><strong>Alrighty, first what is Google Webmaster Central</strong>? (Straight from the home page definition)</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Google Webmasters Central is your one-stop shop for webmaster resources that will help you with your crawling and indexing questions, introduce you to offerings that can enhance and increase traffic to your site, and connect you with your visitors.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Before I go into all of the negatives about Webmasters Central &#8211; how about some positives? Many of Webmaster Central members are very knowledgeable and in many cases can help out with web related questions but the problem relies in finding the quality posters. Google Webmasters Central is flooding with egotistical &#8216;know-it-all&#8217;s&#8217; who probably can&#8217;t even figure out how to work their home toaster so how do you expect to get help from them? For sake of argument let&#8217;s refer to these &#8216;<em>know-it-all</em>&#8216; experts as Patty&#8217;s. Here&#8217;s a quick snapshot of a conversation you can expect&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Business owner</strong>: Hi, my name is Fred and I have a problem. I used to be ranked  #1 in Google for Fred&#8217;s Pizza Parlor and now I am not. In Google&#8217;s eyes it seems that my website is non existent. Please help &#8211; thanks.</p>
<p><strong>Patty 1</strong>: Hey Fred, haha  looks like  someone  sabotaged your website.  I would fire your web guy. The links on your web-page are very misleading. You should fix them.</p>
<p><strong>Business owner</strong>: Could you please be more specific?</p>
<p><strong>Patty 2</strong>: Fred, don&#8217;t listen to Patty 1. He really has no idea what he&#8217;s talking about. Also, be careful not to talk bad to him on this forum like I am. He belongs to a vicious clique and will flame you all day long.</p>
<p><strong>Patty 1</strong>: Hey shut-up Patty 2. Why don&#8217;t you give him some better advice? Hey, Business owner &#8211; why did you edit your post? Are you some kind of undercover Yahoo person? I mean seriously who are you and why did you edit your  post?</p>
<p><strong>Business Owner: </strong>Umm because I spelled something wrong?</p>
<p><strong>Patty 2</strong>: Patty 1, seriously? Who cares. And you suck at SEO and give all the wrong advice. Will someone please remove this post it violates T.O.S. Fred good luck &#8211; your website needs  help and might have some penalties  assessed.</p>
<p><strong>Patty 1</strong>: Are you kidding me Patty 1? Get prepared to be flamed&#8230; I am calling all my clique members over  here and your  going down son.. downtown fast!</p>
<p><strong>Legitimate Helper</strong>: Hi Fred both posters are right your  website could use some love. For an example; there is hidden text in your  footer. The links on your home page are hidden from the end user and your website has two unethical redirects. If you need  help or ideas on fixing these, just ask.</p>
<p><strong>Patty 1</strong>: Wait! Who are you Mr. &#8220;Legitimate Helper,&#8221; yeah seriously. This guys website is messed isn&#8217;t it. So what makes you so special? What makes you think you know what  your doing? Mr. Legitimate Helper &#8211; we don&#8217;t take kind to your kind here.</p>
<p><strong>Patty 2</strong>: Yeah!  Get outta here Legitimate Helper! Patty 1, I  think you need to reference your SEO for dummies manual soon&#8230; You sound like a noob.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;and you get the idea. Legitimate questions end up turning into scenarios just like this. My opinion is this: Google Webmaster Central  does  have very knowledge people to help you with your  website problems &#8211; what it has even more of is cliques, unacknowledged people, ego heads (who think they know what they are talking about and  sound pretty convincing), and cliques who are there just to battle other cliques. It&#8217;s really that simple.</p>
<p>I would suggest following your  favorite blogger  or two and ask questions and get involved with comments.</p>
<p>Cheers to that.</p>
<p>SH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2009/11/16/why-you-shouldnt-always-take-google-webmasters-central-serious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Organic Search: Where&#8217;d they go?</title>
		<link>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2009/11/09/google-organic-search-whered-they-go/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2009/11/09/google-organic-search-whered-they-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google / SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanhakes.com/blog/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron Wall, a popular SEO Blogger and founder of SEO Book wrote an interesting post on November 6 that talked about Google&#8217;s organic results being placed on or below the fold. This brings up many interesting topics of interest like Search Engine Optimization exist in 5 years &#8211; Google&#8217;s Matt Cutts claims yes but really? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Aaron Wall</strong>, a popular SEO Blogger and founder of <strong>SEO Book</strong> wrote an interesting post on November 6 that talked about Google&#8217;s organic results being placed on or below the fold. This brings up many interesting topics of interest like <a href="http://www.seanhakes.com/blog/tag/seo/">Search Engine Optimization</a> exist in 5 years &#8211; Google&#8217;s <a href="http://www.seanhakes.com/blog/tag/matt-cutts/">Matt Cutts</a> claims yes but really?</p>
<p>Aaron made an interesting presumption that touched on the fact that  <a href="http://www.seanhakes.com/blog/tag/google/">Google&#8217;s</a> organic results are at the fold or below the fold for us &#8216;<em>non super high resolution users</em>.&#8217;</p>
<p>Take a look at my screen shot &#8211; Google&#8217;s organic results don&#8217;t show up above  the fold for me at all.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Google Organic" src="http://www.seanhakes.com/images/googleorganic.gif" alt="" width="540" height="343" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.seanhakes.com/2009/11/09/google-organic-search-whered-they-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
